List of Chelsea F.C. records and statistics edit

Hi, I see you keep on changing Eidur Gudjohnsen's name back to it's English version. Please can you stop doing this. The format should be in how it is spelt in his native country, not his adopted one. Cheers. Quentin X (talk) 21:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia articles can be viewed in many languages. However, since this version of the article is written in English, Eidur Gudjohnsen's name should also be written in English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.116.135.134 (talkcontribs) 19:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article may be written in English, but it doesn't follow that the players name should be, as it's not his name. It's the Anglicised version, and not the true version. If this was the case, the players own article would be the Anglicised one. Quentin X (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Then we should edit the player's own article.

Sorry, it's just not the way it works. Rules are rules I'm afraid. Now please stop changing it back or I will have to start proceedings to get your IP blocked. Nicely of course. Quentin X (talk) 10:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you show me these rules you speak of?

I'll get back to you on that. For the time being, please leave it as the article name. Quentin X (talk) 19:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why can't it be left as Eidur Gudjohnsen for the time being?

Demichelis edit

Could you please see Talk:2010–11 Chelsea F.C. season#Demichelis v De Michelis? I'm sure we're both getting a bit tired of just reverting it, and conversation would be much more constructive. Thanks. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 16:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Aeschylus. I noticed that in this edit to Wikipedia:Five pillars of evil, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. aeschylus (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to NSW Lotteries, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. aeschylus (talk) 20:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 20:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply