January 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you recently removed content from Category:122 births without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blanking categories edit

Hello, 66.210.239.23,

Please do not blank categories, even if they are empty. It's important to know what parent categories are present. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Mi Heng. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Hippolytus of Rome. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:28, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2019 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pompeianus. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Borchert's Epochs. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Heading toward a block edit

Hello, Editor,

If you continue to do vandalism by randomly changing dates in ancient history, you will face a permanent block. Liz Read! Talk! 01:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

Hi, I'm UninvitedCompany. I encountered one of your edits while reviewing the recent change log. In the course of evaluating that edit, I reviewed your other contributions. It does not appear to me that your edits are being made in good faith. Some consist of changing dates that appear in well-established articles without the addition of any references or commentary that could substantiate the validity of your changes. These kinds of edits are particularly time consuming for others to evaluate. I see that you have also made unexplained removals of content that appears valid. Several other established editors have expressed concern about your edits and you have not responded to their comments. I cannot find any edits you have made that are clearly the sort of well-referenced additions of content that improve Wikipedia.

Accordingly, I am blocking you from further editing for a period of one year, in accordance with our policies. I am also removing the recent edits you have made. If you have any questions, wish to explain your prior edits, or otherwise wish to clear up any misunderstanding I may have regarding your contributions, please contat me here or vie email. UninvitedCompany 16:51, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry I didn't meant to do that before. Unsigned comment by IP

I'm confused. Did you somehow make all those edits by mistake? UninvitedCompany 17:00, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes. By mistake. But I Learned My Lesson From Now On. Unsigned comment by IP

I find that difficult to believe. UninvitedCompany 17:09, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Winged Victory of Samothrace—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Georgia O'Keeffe - Hands have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sky Above Clouds. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Codename Noreste. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Louisiana have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 17:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Louisiana. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Q T C 17:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.  —Smalljim  17:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply