Wikipedia

66.195.33.222

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Conrad sobre wiki in topic Regarding your undid revision of CoH2
Learn more about this page

February 2014 edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Advanced cardiac life support because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TheEpTic (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copy and paste edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please do not copy and paste from source. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014 edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SFK2 (talk) 02:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Deli nk (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014 edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of colleges and universities in Rhode Island may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • align="center" | 1946<ref>http://www.lincolnedu.com/campus/lincoln-ri | accessdate = 2007-10-05 }}</ref>
  • |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:46, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2016 edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Noodles (musician)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your undid revision of CoH2 edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When you've restored the earlier version of this article Company of Heroes 2, you've made such the explanation for that: "Undid revision 738409468 by Conrad sobre wiki - Additions not written from NPOV. Past edits demonstrate clear editorial bias." Could you please write a bit more specific explanation for that here? In my opinion, the original text is lacking and shows tendentiousness, because it suggests that some Russians protested against how Red Army is depicted in game, but company has guaranteed for its "historical accuracy" after all. After reading such thing, the reader would assume, that the issue was settled in a favor for producer: that the product is fully accurate, some "Ruskies" make some baseless complains and that's all. All I did was adding some more information about what actually concerned the objection in Russia. As I believe people have right to know about it, I consider accusations of lack of NPOV and editorial bias being unjustified. Conrad sobre wiki (talk) 10:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:66.195.33.222&oldid=739840231"