Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 66.192.172.132, has made unhelpful edits to the page Beltway sniper attacks, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jimmy Graham— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 21:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Satchel Paige. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. [1], [2] JoeSperrazza (talk) 00:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Beltway sniper attacks has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beltway sniper attacks may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • OF TRUNK. This photograph clearly shows that the hole is on the HORIZONTAL lip of the trunk (that would only permit objects ejected, therefrom, to travel in a VERTICAL (i.e. "UPWARD direction"(COPYRIGHTED, JMD, 2015).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, 66.192.172.132, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as 50jmd (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Please discuss your changes at Talk:Beltway_sniper_attacks#The_.22Exculpatory_Evidence_Exonerating_So-Called_.27DC_Snipers.22_text. JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Beltway_sniper_attacks. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Regarding your most recent edit, [3], please refer to Talk:Beltway_sniper_attacks#The_.22Exculpatory_Evidence_Exonerating_So-Called_.27DC_Snipers.22_text. I am going to revert your edit, for the reasons given there. Thank you, JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:50jmd and User:66.192.172.132 reported by User:JoeSperrazza (Result: ). Thank you. —JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm NottNott. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pinophyta— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ NottNott talk|contrib 19:33, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to North Carolina Central University may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Alum name=[[James DeVone, Sr.]]-year=1966-Pro Football-Charleston Rockets, WV, Owned by John

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to North Carolina Central University. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- GB fan 16:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  -- GB fan 17:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that in this edit to Queen Latifah, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2019

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George Foreman, you may be blocked from editing. Given the scale of suggesting the involvement of others and of a fake suicide without evidence, further actions can and will get you blocked Nosebagbear (talk) 20:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to trigger the edit filter, as you did at Deaths in January 2019, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.