May 2008 edit

 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Christ Lutheran Academy (Plainfield, Illinois). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 01:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Christ Lutheran Academy (Plainfield, Illinois). κaτaʟavenoTC 01:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Individual and group rights, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Individual and group rights was changed by 66.158.61.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981231 on 2010-12-19T21:18:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of Illinois state symbols because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2015 edit

  Your recent edits to Talk:Chaldean Catholic Church could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Raphael Bidawid edit

You are vandalising this article by reverting a REFERENCED section on Bidawid's ancestry, referenced in HIS OWN WORDS. Unless you have referenced evidence that he regarded himself as an ethnic Chaldean or that he was an ethnic Chaldean, then please do not vandalise this page again. Unlikely, as mainstream academic oponion is that the Chaldean race disappeared circa 6th century BC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EddieDrood (talkcontribs) 10:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

March 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Amaury. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dublin GAA  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wexford GAA with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Leinster GAA with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at All-Ireland Senior Hurling Championship with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Amaury (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ragging in India because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 21:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018 edit

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sue (dinosaur). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kendall-K1 (talk) 20:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm OxonAlex. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gone (novel series) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 16:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polypad (software) (April 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 66.158.61.66! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply