66.102.157.201

collapse years worth of warnings

July 2015 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at South Pacific (musical), you may be blocked from editing. Copperopolis guy previously blocked for adding original research, when he was using the Copperopolis IP Special:Contributions/66.102.146.179. Binksternet (talk) 03:49, 28 July 2015 (UTC) Bink, you might consider creating the page with a welcome template like {{welcomeunsourced}} instead of this scary warning template. ~Adjwilley (talk) 04:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC) Just read your talk page and that of your friends also harassing me. You guys are loose cannons - frequently engaging in the exact same behaviors for which you condemn others and have no business being the pots that call the kettles black. These other kids may tolerate that behavior, I do not. Your recent conduct and that of your friends has been reported to administration for review. Go bother somebody else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.157.201 (talk) 18:43, 28 July 2015‎ (UTC) Welcome! Hello, 66.102.157.201, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source. If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia Contributing to Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  FYI I saw your post at AN and I wanted to let you know that your experience and knowledge are a gift and deserve respect. Unfortunately, here at Wikipedia they are only a starting point for editing articles. Any info added to articles require reliable sources that come from WP:SECONDARY publications. The links in the message above lead to policies and guidelines that will help to get you started. Question can be asked at the Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions. One last comment that is meant in humor - this is not the best place for peace and quite as way too many of us can tell you. Please don't let that put you off from editing though. MarnetteD|Talk 05:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC) What good does it do if 3/4 of my time has to be taken up every month reverting people's reversions of MY revisions to a piece? Like I say all over - these kids need to go bother some other kids who have time energy and tolerance to be tolerating the drama. I do not. When I was teaching, the last time I had to tolerate challenges to my work, my children were little and I wasn't even on tenure track yet. As I have become a respected member of the community - it's like a drill instructor in the military. you do what I tell you or you're not in this man's (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard etc) very long. And like I said - generally people leave me and my work alone even on Wikipedia. To the first-time offenders I tell them just what I wrote on the AN page. Hardheads that do it again I stomp on, and repeat offenders I report to administration - and THEN they go bother somebody else - especially since blocking entire ranges of an ISP in the big city or major university is pointless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.157.201 (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2015‎ (UTC) Sourcing; Reusing info from other articles Hi. I have seen some of your recent talk page comments, and I hope I can help you to avoid further difficulty in contributing to Wikipedia. Your knowledge of broadcasting and recording is, of course, useful in building the encyclopedia -- Because you have this knowledge, you should be able to find sources to support the information that you add to the encyclopedia. WP:V and WP:OR are two of our most important content policies, and if you read them, they will explain why sources need to be cited to verify the facts given in this encyclopedia. If you transfer information from one article here, to another, please make sure that you also transfer the citations to sources given in the first article. If sources are cited there, then the information should not be transferred until you, or someone, researches the facts and finds a reliable source for them. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC) Edit warring notice You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Promising to edit war. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. 1. Major university professors who are tenure-protected do not ``seek consensus or `discuss controversial changes' with A) kids who could be their students B) people who have little to no personal knowledge about the subject at hand and C) are only interested in following a process/flowchart. I've been telling my students and trainees for 50 years: The world is full of clones. Do your best not to become one. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, 2. See response above. and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. 3. See Below. After we and those who support OUR agenda get through with you, Wikipiedia's pages will ALL be semi or permanently protected - thereby killing the whole purpose of the project. Hanging up now and getting a new IP in the 36 hours it takes in this podunk town. The block has already expired. But please be aware of the need to get consensus for any edits that other people may disagree with. You were reported at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive289#MarnetteD repeated edit warring (Result: IP blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC) BBZZZZTTT I reported THEM for harassment not the other way around. You may have me backed into a corner for now due to the technological limitations of this itty bitty town out in the podunks and it may be true that I can't attend to you here and now as I'd like, but once I ditch this retirement life and move back to the Peninsula where I belong - where I can hang up every twenty minutes and get a new IP - all your blocking threats will return to the status of ``ineffective and a waste of time. Especially when I re-inherit my cadre of graduate student assistants who will like nothing better than to re-revert everybody's reversions all day long everyday - and then hang up every twenty minutes as well to get a new IP. Happy Blocking. Why not learn to edit collaboratively instead of having all your work deleted? -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:41, 2 August 2015 (UTC) Because come January, there'll be more of us results-oriented reverters than there will be of you process oriented cubicle warriors. 1. The next time you have success telling your university professors, corporate executives, law enforcement or anybody else how to do their job, let me know I'll call the networks to send in Film at Eleven. 2. When's the last time you tried to `educate' or `teach' a 72 year old tenured university professor in newer and/or better ways of doing things that had any lasting effect? 3. Like I said - once my graduate-student staff and I can hang up every twenty minutes and get a new IP - see above under ``huge staff doing nothing all day long but reverting everybody's reversions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.157.201 (talk) 16:46, 2 August 2015‎ (UTC) November 2015 Read above. Go bother somebody else. Please do not add or change content, as you did at Time Life, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Manway 17:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Edit reverted and edit warring reported. If your behavior keeps up, the Three Revert (and several other related) Rule will be tripped and the page will become protected for all members except for administrators. Go bother somebody else. Please do not add information without citing reliable sources Hello, I'm 32.218.46.71. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rockwell Automation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 32.218.46.71 (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rockwell Automation. - After an unsourced statement has been challenged, you must not add it again without a reliable source. Please stop edit-warring. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC) And then I'll reboot my internet, get a new IP address and go back to what I was doing. You guys can't block everybody on Verizon, AT&T or whoever, and if you do the reverse (block every page on Wikipedia from being edited only by people logged into the system), well, then you've just shot yourself in the foot and violated your own reason for being on the Internet. Thank you for your efforts to contribute to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is great because we all work together to make it better. "Please", "thank you", and "How may I be of service today?" makes things pleasant for everybody. "I am the greatest, my buddies and I will do whatever we want," makes things unpleasant both for everyone else and for the user of this tactic. Peace! —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC) ANI Responses have been made to your posting at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 08:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC) AN/I A discussion about your behavior has been opened on AN/I. You will find it here. You are welcome to respond there. BMK (talk) 01:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC) May 2016 Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC) And I put it back. Keep on and you'll be added to the list of people about whom to complain. Go bother somebody else kid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.157.201 (talk) 02:07, 28 May 2016‎ (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Euryalus (talk) 11:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC) IP hopping tonight and starting over doing exactly as before. Congratulations on wasting your own time. You did this to yourself. Can't block the whole world or you kill the whole main purpose. Bye. Thanks for the heads up. clpo13(talk) 18:51, 29 May 2016 (UTC) True. I'm sure s/he will be as successful as s\he has been with prior attempts. Cheers. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 18:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Why can't we block the whole world? Except for me, of course. And you. And Drmies. And... BMK (talk) 01:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC) November 2016 Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to SpaceCamp. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. April 2017 Hello, I'm CityOfSilver. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Philadelphia English without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CityOfSilver 23:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC) Yes. Remember about WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:BURDEN. You've already been provided these links. Mr KEBAB (talk) 12:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC) August 2017 Hello, I'm PureRED. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bear (gay culture), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PureRED (talk) 19:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. I've been here for years. Why don't you learn from your friends clpo13 Ebyabe Drmies And BMK all of whom found something better to do with their time than bother me with FAQs and company policy explanations I didn't ask about. September 2017 Please do not add or change content, as you did at Quebec French, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 01:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.\ 1. Read the above entries on this talk page before you bother somebody with your ``dribble (sic) 2. Go bother somebody else who G.A.S. November 2017 Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Grease (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 10:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC) Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Grease (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 10:52, 28 November 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 02:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. blocked This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 66.102.157.201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: It's called IP hopping Decline reason: Declining, removing TPA RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. January 2018 To edit, please log in. Last edited: Last edited by: 15:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC) MalnadachBot (talk · contribs) Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2018 (UTC) Nope, don't care. Just get a new IP and go back to what I was doing just like last time. You can't ban the whole world or everybody that doesn't have an account because that's a violation of Wikipedia's core values and it will turn into a read-only resource just like a real encyclopedia. FYI there's thousands of forums around that teach people how to bypass blocks like this - the simplest of which is to IP hop everytime you go online. Turns the admin block activity into an ever increasing game of whack-a-mole. And there's thousands of other step by step instructions online on other methods for frustrating Wikipedia admins to the point that they grow tired of the drama and quit. Since Wikipedia is not allowed as a reference by any major research organization anyway, that means it's been long ago relegated to the realm of entertainment by any sort of serious endeavor. The ensuing cliques, drama and administrators ganging up on people is one of any number of reasons nobody cares about it anymore. IP hopping now. Bye. June 2018 Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Walker Hayes, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC) September 2018 OK you tell me. How can Roy Markowitz GO ON to play with Janis Joplin after seeing Manhattan Transfer play live in 1974 when she died in 1970? Hello, I'm RHcosm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Manhattan Transfer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. RHcosm (talk) 04:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. October 2018 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. 2601:188:180:1481:E08B:61B7:5650:EA7E (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC) I'm changing that to a level four warning--there's a long history here, for which you haven't shown any sign of acknowledgment. 2601:188:180:1481:E08B:61B7:5650:EA7E (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2601:188:180:1481:E08B:61B7:5650:EA7E (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

66.102.157.201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Block no longer needed or usable/applicable. Offender has changed telecom companies after theirs merged with AT&T which offers dynamic IP addresses from four states. See below under August 2019. Have fun playing whackamole guys.66.102.157.201 (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---