Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as WZKW, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tdl1060 (talk) 03:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of WZKW

edit
 

The article WZKW has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real proof station exists. There is no "WZKW" or "WZKW-LP" licensed and FCCdata.org does not yield any results for "DWZKW" or "DWZKW-LP". Claimed ERP exceeds that of a legal Part 15 FM station. It could be a pirate station, but there are no reliable sources that would support notability as a pirate station. The only online mentions of this station are outdated affiliate lists, which could indicate that it once existed, but as a pirate station or Part 15 station, as no such station was ever actually licensed. As such, the station does not meet any of the requirements for WP:BROADCAST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tdl1060 (talk) 03:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of WZKW for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WZKW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WZKW until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NeutralhomerTalk • 00:41 on March 12, 2019 (UTC) 00:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rebecca Rotzler for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Rotzler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Rotzler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sal2100 (talk) 18:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply