edit

Please get consensus for your edits before reinstating them. IMO the material you are adding probably should be in a separate article, but regardless, multiple editors have reverted you so you should discuss your edits on the talk page instead of edit warring them back in. Thank you, Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Aoi: There will be no consensus because their additions are all false (TVTropolis and Gusto are dead Canadian channels). As to the IP; all future false edits will earn your IP a block, and likely a further restriction from any Ion/Katz article edits. Nate (chatter) 01:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Qubo, you may be blocked from editing. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at E. W. Scripps Company. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Qubo. Aoi (青い) (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Ion_Television.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2021

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 19

edit

  Hello, I'm JennilyW. I noticed that you recently made an edit to BabyFirst in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🍓⋆JennilyW♡🍧 (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Block 13. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Munsch

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Munsch, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 184.146.36.142 (talk) 23:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Munsch, you may be blocked from editing. and the other articles you edited in the past--184.146.36.142 (talk) 23:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Play7

edit

  Hello, 64.231.141.73. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Play7, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply