62.253.69.202

Welcome!

Hello, 62.253.69.202, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 81.158.98.220 (talk) 15:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, I'm PhantomTech. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Pedri seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 04:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Obsessive love—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:33, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Regarding original research, please see WP:OR which includes "any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources". Unless a source is provided that explicitly states/concludes the regard a person is "widely" held in, it is original research to put together any number of sources that describe them and then make that kind of conclusion yourself. Thank you Melcous (talk) 22:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rejection of evolution by religious groups. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Theistic science. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

16:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Tgeorgescu (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 17:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Hilarious. The cronyism on this site is unbelievable. I can't believe I'm being censored for thwarting antitheistic argumentation, on a Western, ostensibly humanitarian platform. Clearly you and your chums didn't read (or just didn't care for) WP: BATTLEGROUND. I suppose the rules don't apply when you're part of the bureaucracy. Fascistic posers. Contributing here was always likely to be a dead-end street anyways. Hope you enjoy your sad, nihilistic lives, boys. I'm outta here.62.253.69.202 (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm an atheist myself and a member of Humanists UK. You're clueless. Doug Weller talk 19:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

It seems comprehension is not your strongest suit. Nonetheless, I don't care to spell out my point to you. I can't stand you insular militant atheists anyhow. You clearly have no intention of retracting your decision; so, please, stop responding, and get off my page. 62.253.69.202 (talk) 19:41, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Taking a strong stance against pseudoscience is by no means antitheism. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

---