October 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to James Kirkup— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CrystaC (talk) 11:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Kirkup. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James Kirkup was changed by 62.253.68.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881945 on 2015-10-27T11:11:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to James Kirkup with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. CrystaC (talk) 11:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to James Kirkup. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Gilliam (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Auchinleck Talbot F.C. has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cecil Jackson-Cole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhrm77 (talk) 12:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 666 (number), you may be blocked from editing. Dhrm77 (talk) 12:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rings of Uranus— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 14:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Escapepea (talkcontribs) 10:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sobolev space, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sobolev space. Jim1138 (talk) 08:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Francis Masson, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. David.moreno72 10:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John Logie Baird. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. David.moreno72 10:25, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Francis Masson, you may be blocked from editing. David.moreno72 10:25, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sarah Good has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sarah Good was changed by 62.253.68.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916053 on 2016-11-14T15:34:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2017

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Nicola Sturgeon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Viewfinder (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. Your recent edit to the page DC Thomson appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 12:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Aurora2698. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Michael Gove— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aurora (talk | contribs) 08:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michael Gove, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Scotland. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.