60.234.233.190

References required

Please don't add text without references to wikipedia. It may be deleted at any time. `'Míkka>t 15:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

To Mikka: Please stop using wikipedia's rules in an abusive manner to attempt to crush viewpoints you do not agree with. See WP:GAME

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Mikkalai. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If you want to talk to this person, please do so in a kind manner, regardless of what he/she may have done to anger you  Atyndall93 | talk  03:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I have blocked you for personal attacks and vandalism This was over the top. Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

60.234.233.190 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

lol poor prohibitionist mikka should toughen up and stop pushing his uneducated views onto other people. the real vandals are mikka and jaysweet, both of them have been using the rules of wikipedia in bad faith to crush viewpoints they do not agree with. you should look into their activities surrounding cannabis culture and how they love to push information they dont agree with into the memory hole. my conduct on his talk page was inappropriate, it was a mistake, but it was made because i am EXTREMELY frustrated at the fact that a person who has openly displayed their bias against a certain subject is trying to use the rules of wikipedia in a way intended to destroy the article on said subject. THIS IS MERELY A MORE SUBTLE, INSIDIOUS FORM OF VANDALISM. one that, in my opinion, is far more damaging to wikipedia than some silly words on a users talk page

Decline reason:

Sorry, we don't take kindly to ad hominem attacks or other harassment, here, and you're not going to be unblocked while there's any indication you'll continue such abuse. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

60.234.233.190 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

as i stated before, it was inappropriate and a mistake. a rash decision, made badly and now highly regretted as the valid comments i made on his talk page have also been removed. i have no intention of continuing any abuse. i would ask however that someone PLEASE look into what is happening regarding these users Mikka and Jaysweet who are enforcing wikipedia's rules in an abusive manner to further their own anti-drug agenda

Decline reason:

Proper temporary block. Please email allegations of admin abuse to "arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org" — MBisanz ^talk 05:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Spencer Gollan

I believe there is an error in the article about Spencer Gollan Snr. I believe he attended Cambridge University not Oxford. Cambridge University Alumni is cited by ancestry.com. He is said to have attended Jesus from 1878. Spencer Herbert Gollan was born in New Zealand in 1860. He attended school in London.--Lesley Read (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

I have a family connection to Spencer's wife. I am happy to discuss further. I bother to write this in the belief one should try to ensure records are correct. I doubt there are many to have concern but if this is helpful I am pleased to have commented.--Lesley Read (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

---