July 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Nicolas Sarkozy, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Mirek Topolánek. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mirek Topolánek with this edit. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Nicolas Sarkozy with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Wknight94 talk 20:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Scramble for Africa appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 11:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 04:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

reminder

edit

don't add your junk to pages, about Talmudic masters and all that... this is a final warning. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 10:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2011

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 10:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked for 1 month for disruptive editing

edit
You have resumed / continued editing disruptively, including some repeated and rather blatant biographies of living persons policy violations on George Soros and other unsourced negative information. Whatever you are trying to do here is advocacy, not writing an encyclopedia.
If you continue this activity when the current 1 month block expires you will be blocked for longer. Wikipedia is open to all viewpoints, but it is an encyclopedia and values neutral points of view and is particularly not a soapbox or medium for advocacy or advancement of agendas. What you're doing here is blatantly against Wikipedia core values, and if you do it again it will not be tolerated. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 06:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

November 2011

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username N5iln. I noticed you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide verification for your edit. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! Wikipedia articles are written by people like you and me, and we care a lot about the quality of the encyclopedia. Please help us make it better. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

In response to the accusation below: "no personal attack was made; the perfectly reasonable questions were "coolie" posed on the users talk page." please refrain from further attempts at censure, and appreciate that not all newbies use templated and pre-packaged reponses. Signed, Baron Sascha Kahen "coz i iz BLEK"   Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:N5iln. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Subprime mortgage crisis, you may be blocked from editing. Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 11:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

the ECB article links to the subprime crisis, despite European homeowners not being involved in such financial scams in the real estate/housing markets. unlike the USA, the European Peoples have historical bonds and claims to their properties.

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikipedia articles are not vehicles for promoting political viewpoints or ideologies, and article Discussion pages are not venues for ideological debate. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 14:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked

edit

I can see from your talk page that you have a long history of disruptive editing and addition of unsourced negative content. You recently just came off a one-month block, and you've immediately returned to disruptive editing. Looking at your contributions, I'm seeing addition of unsourced content, using the talk page as a forum (and placing inappropriate comments in random locations on talk pages), and editing that pretty clearly seems to be slanted towards antisemitism. All of this has occurred in the two days since you've returned to editing, and it's obvious that you're not here to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. For that reason:

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 months for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Swarm X11|11|11 01:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

April 2013

edit

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:East India Company. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Fyrael (talk) 01:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply