September 2024

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Noted, apologies for that. 51.191.202.10 (talk) 23:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)dReply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 12:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Huh?

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.191.202.10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dude, I was editing the Sandbox. WTF? 51.191.202.10 (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Zero constructive edits from this IP. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

51.191.202.10 (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

51.191.202.10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dude, I was editing the Sandbox. WTF? 51.191.202.10 (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dude, I was editing the Sandbox. WTF? [[Special:Contributions/51.191.202.10|51.191.202.10]] ([[User talk:51.191.202.10#top|talk]]) 15:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dude, I was editing the Sandbox. WTF? [[Special:Contributions/51.191.202.10|51.191.202.10]] ([[User talk:51.191.202.10#top|talk]]) 15:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dude, I was editing the Sandbox. WTF? [[Special:Contributions/51.191.202.10|51.191.202.10]] ([[User talk:51.191.202.10#top|talk]]) 15:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

It is deeply inappropriate of you to be abusing Wikipedia's sandbox to express your personal pornographic preferences. To be clear, if you wish to make a specific constructive edit to an article and will knock off your blatant abuse, I'll be happy to lift the block. --Yamla (talk) 15:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Um, I never did that? I was testing the undo button a lot, so it's possible someone else did that first and I ended up restoring it by coincidence. Otherwise please could you provide an edit diff where I inserted content like that that hadn't already been added previously. 51.191.202.10 (talk) 18:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
So, to be clear, you do not have a specific constructive edit you wish to make and are unwilling to commit to knocking off your abuse? --Yamla (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, no. I will be making constructive edits. I'm just disputing that there was any abuse taking place. It wasn't me "expressing my personal pornographic preferences", and the edits I made were to the Sandbox which is hardly disruptive anyway. 51.191.202.10 (talk) 18:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't see the specific edit you plan to make. Can you please post the specific constructive edit you wish to make? Will you knock off your garbage edits to the sandbox if unblocked? --Yamla (talk) 18:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply