The edit I made to the news.com.au entry did not require a source as the source was news.com.au itself. If you check the website, you will be able to see immediately that it regularly publishes tabloid articles reproduced from partners like the UK’s Sun newspaper and reports on occurrences in social media platforms like Tik Tok and Instagram. Your deletion of my edit was in my opinion unwarranted. Can you please explain why you deleted it.

RE: Move

edit

I meant that I moved your question to the bottom of the talk page (Talk:News.com.au), it's under a new section which I just used part of the question as a title to. Usually that's how people do things, they click the New Section button top right and make a new section (which you can navigate to using the menu near the top of the page under the templates). – 2804:F14:C060:8A01:34B1:F4B0:5089:8239 (talk) 12:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, News.com.au, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 11:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Journalism in Australia. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you have an axe to grind, this isn't the place to do so. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
To reply to your comment at the top, that is considered to be WP:SYNTH. Which is not acceptable. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply