September 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Xiangguo Qiu, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 10:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

That's simply not true at all. I gave sufficient reasoning and even a direct link explaining it. Previous article was promoting debunked viral misinformation and framing it as if that scientist was being investigated for creating and weaponising covid. Except many things wrong about that. For one, the CBC never once mentioned or connected the scientists to the shipment of viruses or to Wuhan. Secondly a tweet misrepresented the CBC reports and People started making misinformation on social media. I removed that misinformation and even gave a link explaining why it is spinning wrongfully on what actually occured. I have not only given sufficient reasoning. I think I over gave too much reasoning in edit description by posting both reasoning and the link to back it up. [1] 49.181.132.3 (talk) 10:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
On second look, I see that my removal of that particular edit was wrong. I accidentally misread it as sending "covid virus" to China but it was actually saying "ebola virus". So I will definitely not be disputing that edit reversion as I agree with it. My bad. 49.181.132.3 (talk) 11:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply