49.178.80.22

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Campbell (surname) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Campbell (surname) was changed by 49.178.80.22 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953152 on 2021-12-15T07:19:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Campbell (surname) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. The Banner talk 09:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Campbell (surname). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 09:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Campbell (surname) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Banner talk 09:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The man is a racist guy. Didn't you read his article? He has also founded a far right political party.49.178.80.22 (talk) 10:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Campbell (surname). The Banner talk 11:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WTF is wrong with you! Don't you read comments?? I just commented here and I have left multiple edit summaries and you don't even care to respond!49.178.80.22 (talk) 12:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

The problem is al at your side. The articles gives a short overview of their jobs, like politician. "Hate speaker" is not a job. The Banner talk 14:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

The problem was at your side too. Atleast I tried to discuss it and I put edit summaries.49.178.80.22 (talk) 14:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Where did you start the discussion? The Banner talk 16:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Or do you mean those two sentences on the talk page there, after receiving your Level 4 warning? The Banner talk 16:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 49.178.80.22. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

December 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick Moyes (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Graeme Campbell (politician)

I have removed the section you added today at Graeme Campbell (politician) as it seemed to be off-topic, and only about the party he founded -and not him specifically. I have explained my rationale at Talk:Graeme Campbell (politician), and editors are expected to reach a consensus there before any attempt to re-add the content is made. Be advised that you will be blocked again should you try to simply reinsert it without engaging in a conversation with other editors there. Nick Moyes (talk) 12:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

I just finished reading your discussion in the Teahouse. I noticed you said my edit was not reverted. Did you mean to write something else. 49.178.80.22 (talk) 12:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

I will check shortly. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Nope. I don't see anything where I said I had not reverted you. But I'm not going to engage in further discussions. You should not edit this page further until your block has expired except to post an WP:UNBLOCK request. But I advise you against doing so, as you'll probably get nowhere. Nick Moyes (talk) 17:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi 49.178.80.22! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, False accusations, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

---