49.178.13.44

June 2021

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Megamind (video game) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chompy Ace 23:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump

Hi there! My name's Tamzin. I'm afraid I had to revert your recent contributions to Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump. By stating the conclusion of those sources in the encyclopedia's voice, your edit constituted editorializing. Controversial statements made by sources should be made with in-text attribution, and a conclusion like that does not belong in the first paragraph of an article. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out on my talk page, or by replying here with the template {{ping|Tamzin}}. Thanks. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 23:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Be Best

Hello, I'm Schetm. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Be Best seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. schetm (talk) 02:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Godsstone, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.talk, FAQ, contribs

🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs | please use {{ping}} on reply)} 03:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:FIang Xdot repasent aa per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FIang Xdot repasent aa. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

---