45.251.33.44

February 2021

Serols, please check whether the references which I removed had any information. Both the news articles were redacted and hence the information accompanying those references is unverifiable, and hence must be removed. 45.251.33.44 (talk) 11:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, please use the article talk page, before you delete whole sections. --Serols (talk) 11:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Serols, I agree with the IP that it shouldn't require discussion on the talk page to remove, because the material was blatantly promotional, although I would encourage them to start a discussion on the talk about some of the less promotional (but still non-neutral) content. (Full disclosure: I came from a Teahouse thread posted by the IP asking why they were reverted.) Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 12:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse thread: [1] Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 12:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello Giraffer, your justification is enough for me. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello 45.251.33.44, sorry for my reverts and warnings. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

It's okay, Serols (after all, it is human to err). Thanks, Giraffer for helping out here! 45.251.33.44 (talk) 12:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

---