3fivesix

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janice Marturano (January 21)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

None of the "references" here constitute reliable source coverage about her; they are virtually all staff or contributor profiles on the websites of directly affiliated organizations, which are primary sources that cannot support notability. Reliable sourcing in Wikipedia is content about her which is published or broadcast by media outlets she is not directly affiliated with -- it is not conferred by her "our founder" PR profile on the website of her own organization.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janice Marturano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janice Marturano (February 12)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

There are still areas that need citations, which I noted. I am not sure that she meets notability with a single book and an award that is ok but not what was originally stated - she did not win THE Nautilus award, but won a silver award (a second level, not gold) in a category with four other books. Nautilus gives out awards in numerous categories at both gold and silver levels. So she isn't a slam-dunk for WP:AUTHOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janice Marturano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello! 3fivesix, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janice Marturano (March 20)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Frankly still questionable enough (even for WP:CREATIVE) so this honestly needs all of the further available in-depth third-party news sources there are.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janice Marturano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Janice Marturano has a new comment

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Janice Marturano. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 01:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janice Marturano (April 9)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please continue to improve the references as recommended by the previous reviewer, and eliminate the promotional language.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janice Marturano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 04:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janice Marturano has been accepted

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Janice Marturano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Worldbruce (talk) 04:45, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic