February 2022 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dewsbury. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 10:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Theatre in education. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 10:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Theatre in education, you may be blocked from editing. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 10:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Theatre in education. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 10:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 11:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Microsoft Teams have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Sheep8144402. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Norton College seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sheep (talkhe/him) 11:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Norton College. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:38, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Norton College, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 11:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, 37.72.118.90. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leeds United F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MahR KinG💫 (talk) 11:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ted Lasso, you may be blocked from editing. ButterCashier (talk) 11:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2023 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to King Charles have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at King Charles. Technopat (talk) 13:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Fanfanboy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ä have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fanfanboy (talk) 14:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zenly (April 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 37.72.118.90! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply