2RDD

Jxmmi

Hello, thank you for creating the above mentioned draft, as I've previously created it and left it to rot it is still on my watchlist. Jxmmi was not featured on "Throw Sum Mo" and other listed recordings as he is the primary artist as a member of Rae Sremmurd, and would please not overlink names, if you already mentioned Mike Will Made It before please don't link it again because as much as your draft is promising it might not get accepted and might require clean up first. Otherwise, good job. dxneo (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

And you don't have to mention every song he was featured on, only breakthrough songs like "No Flex Zone" and "No Type" will do, you may mention studio albums. Featured songs can be listed under the discography section Thank you dxneo (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slim Jxmmi (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slim Jxmmi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Robert McClenon, I happen to disagree with you on the subject not being suitable for a standalone article due to no SIGCOV and such, see this and tell me if it's just "passing mention(s)". He has been the subject of multiple independent news articles here, here, here, here, and probably more since I can't cite the whole internet. I like feel you judged the draft based on its previously AFD'd article. I strongly urge you to reconsider, I'll be on the lookout for your response Thank you. dxneo (talk) 10:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 2RDD! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Zerry DL

Hello 2RDD, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Zerry DL, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zerry DL.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces: Okay, cool. Y'all should discuss the issue, If it's delete then delete and if it's to Keep then keep it. I humble myself because you all are better then me here.. Thank You.. I will keep improving.. 2RDD (talk) 07:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Neville Records

Hello 2RDD, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Neville Records, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Records.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Tochi Bright Clement

Hi 2RDDD, please I need help understanding why an article (Draft:Tochi Bright Clement) I submitted for review has been in process for the past 12 hours. Please I need you to check it out for me please. Thank you for your time. Greybliss (talk) 03:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

@Greybliss: That draft need to be deleted; it is full of promotions and primary sources. Pls do not write about yourself which may generate conflict of interest. The draft Is now marked for deletion and it may be marked for non-creation again. I suggest you leave the article and study the rules and regulations on Wikipedia. Thank You! And Secondly, why did you use its real name? You suppose to create with stage name..2RDD (talk) 10:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

2RDD

Thank you for the advice. Plus I created the draft in my sandbox, it was moved to this page by a bot admin when I submitted it for review Greybliss (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Hello 2RDD. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:2RDD. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=2RDD|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Various articles. Your very first edit clearly do not look like a very first edit either. Graywalls (talk) 19:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

I do not receive payments for my edits please, I'm here only to contribute to Wikipedia; Thank You! And God Bless You!!! @Graywalls 2RDD (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Plutomania Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plutomania Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plutomania Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Graywalls (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qing Madi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Cubana Chief Priest

Hello, This is to notify you that the Draft article you created two months ago on Draft:Cubana Chief Priest has been moved to Mainspace by me on Cubana Chief Priest. I wished to continue to expand the article from there. Chat Term talk 15:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Cubana Chief Priest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cubana Chief Priest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubana Chief Priest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Slim Jxmmi

Hello, 2RDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Slim Jxmmi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Are You Gone Already

Hello, 2RDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Are You Gone Already, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ByronMessia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Similar name issues

Hello 2RDD, hope you are fine? I tried requesting for change of username because our user name accidentally looks alike and also I requested it because you came to Wikipedia before me and also to avoid any issues, please can you request change of name because it didn't work for me for some reason. 75DD (talk) 13:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

@75DD: Never!!! Because I'm older here. You could leave it and avoid conflict. Bro or what gender you are, I think you took from my name. I ain't no JJC. Go and request again. Thank You!!! 2RDD (talk) 14:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Leaving it is fine and how I wish your gmail was opened I would've cleared you there because the explanation goes with a personal stuff. Why do I want to make similar name with some one on Wikipedia? It's not making sense bro 75DD (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

@75DD: To be able to change your name visit this place [1] 2RDD (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit Conflit / Wikipedia Guidelines

@2RDD Hello Trust You Are Doing Fine ? First of all i would like to state that coming to my talkpage to rain insult on me is highly unproffesional and not acceptable because of an edit i made on the article Verydarkman you tagged stub which as an editor we are suppose to expand.

According to Wikipedia's guidelines, any registered editor has the right to edit or make changes to almost any page, provided that these edits are supported by reliable citations. Threatening to block me for making changes that I believe are accurate is both unacceptable and unprofessional. Wikipedia is not a private blog or a personal website where individual preferences dictate content. It is a collaborative platform where contributions are made in good faith, and edits are based on verifiable sources. Blocking me undermines the fundamental principle of Wikipedia, which is to create a comprehensive and balanced repository of knowledge through the collective efforts of its community. It is essential to respect this collaborative nature and address disagreements through discussion and consensus, rather than resorting to threats and unilateral actions . Afrowriter (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

@Afrowriter: I understand you want to expand but when expanding try to use reliable sources all else Unreliable source tag would be placed on it. Leave the article Verydarkman for now. In the future we will expand it. But not now. Simple as that. And two: You are not writing neutral point of view. 2RDD (talk) 08:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

@2RDD You cannot dismiss top Nigerian news platforms like Premium Times, Vanguard, Channels TV, and Daily Times as unreliable sources. These are well-respected publications with a track record of accurate reporting. Despite not being from Nigeria, my extensive experience writing for Wikipedia allows me to confidently assert that the sources I used are credible and reliable sources. Asking me not to contribute to an article you created, especially when my edits are backed by evidence from these credible sources, is against Wikipedia's principles. Wikipedia's rules emphasize the importance of verifiability and the use of reliable sources, regardless of the editor's background. By preventing me from contributing, you are not only undermining these principles but also stifling the collaborative spirit that Wikipedia thrives on. It's essential to respect the guidelines and allow contributions that enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of articles. Afrowriter (talk) 08:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

@2RDD Wikipedia guidelines emphasize the importance of reliable sources. Reliable sources are typically those that have editorial oversight, are peer-reviewed, or are recognized as authoritative in their field. These include academic journals, reputable news outlets, and recognized experts. When changes are made to an article based on such sources, they enhance the credibility and accuracy of the content. also changes made to the article which were backed with reliable sources we be reverted as Wikipedia is not a private website or biography blog space where you make edit based how you feel it should be when its supposed to be based on information found on this notable platforms. Afrowriter (talk) 11:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)