November 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Skepticism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hatnote. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please refer to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Hatnote. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

{{Other uses}} templates at the bottom of {{About}} hatnotes edit

During my October-November 2022 block, I noticed {{other uses}} templates at the bottom of {{about}} and {{for multi}} hatnote templates, which was not acceptable. Here is an example of this:

I am trying now to improve the hatnotes by placing the other uses template at the top or collide it to another hatnote. 2607:FEA8:FD04:8132:3085:9554:1F37:BF97 (talk) 23:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply