December 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aaron Swartz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

recent contentious edits edit

thanks for taking the time out of your busy day to send me a polite note regarding your no-doubt firmly held beliefs on arron Schwartz I'll look into your assertion, see if it is sourced by reputable experts in the field.

thanks for helping us on our encyclopedia, Saintstephen000 (talk)

  1. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable sources to support content of articles. We don't accept the fact that someone comes along to Wikipedia and says that they know something is a fact, for the very simple reason that anyone can come along and post anything they like, true or false.
  2. No matter how firmly you hold the belief that Aaron Swartz was murdered, it is not acceptable to change references to claim that they say things other than what they actually say.
  3. Presumably your repeatedly changing "November" to "NovembeAr" was a mistake, not deliberate, but please be careful to avoid making such mistakes again.
  4. If you find that your edits are reverted by other editors who disagree with them, don't keep repeating those edits over and over again. Instead, be willing to discuss the differences of opinion, with a view to trying to reach agreement. Repeatedly restoring one's own version on the face of disagreement form other editors, known as "edit-warring" is not constructive. You may like to read Wikipedia's policy on edit-warring. JBW (talk) 21:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This IP address has been blocked from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on another IP range. The time for which the block is set is longer than that for which the origianl block was set. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of this page. JBW (talk) 21:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2601:642:4C02:236B:4953:BDF4:DBFC:DF64 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Wikipedia is showing signs of COINTELPRO, Legal Racism, Covert Cover-ups, Collateral Damage, and intentional Internet Cnsorship!!!!!! 2601:642:4C02:236B:4953:BDF4:DBFC:DF64 (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.