Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Chinese Australians. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2601:183:C600:20A:3CFE:5103:7561:37CA) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:2601:183:C600:20A:250B:E91F:9B73:377E have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sorry that was just a mistake. I wasn’t trying to edit that. I must have hit the edit button by mistake. My apologys

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edits you made to Chinese Australians, Immigration to Argentina, Greek Mexicans, The Adventures of Pluto Nash and Japanese Australians did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

How exactly was my edit not constructive. You didn’t explain exactly how it was not constructive. If you could explain that, that would be great. Explain to me. Thanks

How was my edits not constructive. You keep insisting my edits are not constructive yet you fail to explain how there not constructive. If your going to accuse me of unconstructive edits, explain how they are unconstructive, otherwise stop falsely accusing me.

You are adding more places to articles already tagged as needing citations for the existing ones, trying to improve on content by changing it from, "Australia was the most popular country for Japanese people to live." to, "Australia was the most popular country for Japanese people to live in besides Japan." That's known as stating the obvious and completely unnecessary. Also, which reliable source says this? I don't mean to embarrass you, but contributing to Wikipedia requires WP:COMPETENCE. Thank you for your understanding. Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on The Adventures of Pluto Nash. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Your recent editing history at The Adventures of Pluto Nash shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.