Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied, we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details, there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

  1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
    Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
    If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
  2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
    If you are able to edit the sandbox, you are not blocked from editing. Either the autoblock on your IP address has already expired, or you weren't blocked in the first place. Either way, you can resume editing.
  3. If you are still blocked, follow the directions below:
    1. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Unblock request" section.
    2. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page, and click save.
      If you cannot edit your own talk page, use the Unblock Ticket Request System to make your request.
I want to create an account but am blocked for three years by Graham87 for "disruptive editing" despite the fact that I have never had a Wikipedia account or edited any pages. 2600:8805:9200:888:5880:A5D9:5831:A930 (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8805:9200:888:5880:A5D9:5831:A930 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to create an account but am blocked for three years by Graham87 for "disruptive editing" despite the fact that I have never had a Wikipedia account or edited any pages.

Decline reason:

If you have never edited, then you are not the target of the block. Unfortunately, sometimes abusive users make such measures necessary to protect Wikipedia. What you can do is go to a different location with a different IP address and create an account there; you can then return to your current location and use the account, as the block is only on IP editing. 331dot (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think this was declined a bit too quickly. @Graham87: why is this IP range blocked for three years? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@NinjaRobotPirate: Because almost all (~100%) of its contribs over the years that I checked were by this rather interesting editor who messed around with Jewish topics and disambiguation pages in a rather ... unconventional way that broke many Manual of Style rules, destroyed the formatting, and tried to "fix" grammar/phrasing in a way that was not helpful. I did try to communicate by email with this user (see the latest contribs) but got some ... rather unusual responses, which indicate that this person is not suited to editing Wikipedia. She told me she used to have an account but chose to stop using it ... she said she couldn't recall its name though. Debresser also dealt with this editor and the discussion they had mentioning her is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism/Archive 37#IPv6 user needs careful review. I'd be OK with turning on account creation for the range ... an unblock may well require daily monitoring as she makes prodigious quantities of edits. Graham87 04:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Fixing ping to Debresser. Graham87 04:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
As indicated at the WT:JUDAISM page, there was hardly an acceptable edit among the edits made by the editor in this IPv6 range. If this was an existing editor, then they should at least me aware of the basics of editing, which makes the obvious fact that the opposite is the case all the more worrisome. Let them create a (new) account, then we can see, but I am afraid this is one editor we can do without. Again, the range block is not a real obstacle, since the editor can always create an account, so better block this range. Debresser (talk) 18:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply