Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2600:1702:1690:E10:5DB1:E494:B72E:DDE8) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 19:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Anon vs Walter Görlitz

edit

So what, who cares? My IP changes automatically, and it doesn't make me a sock puppet just because WG prefers to block user's accounts. This is just a ploy by WG, to stop me from doing productive edits since he is prejudice towards IP users, and doesn't want to do actual work on articles I edit that he watches. He hounds/stalks and reverses or alters EVERY edit I make. He has it out for me and only wants to get his way on articles. It's a smokescreen and deflection... He causes conflicts, edit wars and removes constructive edits that fix problems not creates them like he does. He was wrong about Jon Gibson contributions, Billy Graham edits and List of Christian rock bands, among others. It eats him up so he claims he's being attacked when he makes errors yet has no problem blaming IP users when they don't do what he wants/likes. Such hypocrisy and fallacy! Go back to overusing commas but start watching what you're doing before reverting every legitimate edit! Bye. 2600:1702:1690:E10:5DB1:E494:B72E:DDE8 (talk) 21:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I know where editors are contributing from too. So? And WG was the reason for any/all fake "disruptions" i've been blamed for in the past as well as him being guilty of it as well, including recently (BG/JG/YMBT/LOCRB). He's at fault not me. He has been blocked as well. He's also been exposed on social media and CL! =) so much for thanking editors who didn't deserve it... 2600:1702:1690:E10:1C28:EDAF:5AB3:E6FD (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply