January 2023

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1005:B166:F09D:9C73:B931:52A9:91A2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to apologize for being disrespectful and rude. I know what I did was wrong. I hope i can earn a second chance. Thank you. 2600:1005:B166:F09D:9C73:B931:52A9:91A2 (talk) 20:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please log on to your account to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 21:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hope to hear from someone soon! 2600:1005:B166:F09D:9C73:B931:52A9:91A2 (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I do not have an account. 2600:1005:B166:F09D:9C73:B931:52A9:91A2 (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:January 6 United States Capitol attack, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Czello 21:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DatGuyTalkContribs 21:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

I’m so sorry. May I please have a second chance? 2600:1005:B166:F09D:9C73:B931:52A9:91A2 (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1005:B166:F09D:9C73:B931:52A9:91A2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to apologize for being disrespectful. If unblocked early, I will focus my efforts on contributing in the field of history. Thank you. 2600:1005:B166:F09D:9C73:B931:52A9:91A2 (talk) 21:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You worked hard to demonstrate very clearly this would be a bad idea. Yamla (talk) 22:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2023

edit

May I please have a second chance? 2600:1005:B166:F09D:9C73:B931:52A9:91A2 (talk) 21:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Give him a second chance! 128.253.57.28 (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply