July 2020 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Buddhism in Japan. You appear to be the same person who has received numerous previous warnings on related IP talk pages, which you have not heeded, see: User talk:49.35.6.203, User talk:2405:204:91AF:2558:80A2:62F8:198D:B74F, User talk:2409:4042:497:F2CD:0:0:29B6:B8A0, and others. Your edits improperly inflate the number of Buddhists in the world, often misrepresenting the cited sources, using unreliable sources, or not providing a source at all, but just adding your own commentary. Today's edits such as: [1] and in other articles: [2], etc., fail to adhere to the neutral point of view policy, because they try to present only one particular point of view as being a fact, and ignore the rest. In normal circumstances, after ignoring so many warnings, you would be blocked from editing. Because you don't use an account, your IP number changes so often, and there are other people in the same IP range, it is a little difficult to block you, so we will need to use other methods like article page protection and partial blocks, in order to protect Wikipedia from your continued disruptive editing. Since this may restrict some other peoples' ability to edit, it would be preferable if you would stop, and ensure that all your edits adhere to the core content policies. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply