24.228.70.170

June 2019

Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Carvel (franchise)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Everedux ^(talk) 01:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mint 400 Records (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mint 400 Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mint 400 Records, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   14:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 24.228.70.170! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  Velella  Velella Talk   14:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neil Sabatino (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neil Sabatino and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neil Sabatino, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 23:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mint 400 Records has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mint 400 Records. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mint 400 Records (May 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

There is already an article (whether or not there should be) at Mint 400 Records discography. There is a history of paid editing and gaming of the system.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mint 400 Records has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mint 400 Records. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mint 400 Records discography for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mint 400 Records discography, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mint 400 Records discography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

I don't understand why people who are not familiar with the guidelines for Record Label notability are able to delete important record labels pages without any reason? The record label has put out 400 releases from bands that are charting on radio all year every year on the NACC charts and getting major sync licenses with network shows. They aren't mentioned in every article but are the driving force behind the promotion of over 400 albums. Albums that feature very notable musicians like Frank Iero of My Chemical Romance, Matthew Caws of Nada Surf, Victoria Williams, Max Bemis of Say Anything, Matt Pryor of The Get Up Kids and a whole bunch more. These are bands that have been covered in every major music publication and many of the Mint 400 Records bands have been covered in those publications. Please just show me an article where any contemporary record label is discussed directly and not just the product they make? I mostly used their old info and I'm not quite sure what exactly is not neutral because it really doesn't use positive language to describe anything, it uses facts right from articles written about the label and direct quotes. I've been following this label for about a decade and I write for many different music publications and this is the label that matters from North New Jersey, I just find it hard to believe that with their track record and especially the production of their live events like "The North Jersey Indie Rock Festival" and "Indie Binge" that they are not considered note-able when they have passing mentions in Alternative Press, Paste, Brooklyn Vegan and other places. But as stated, the articles are about the product they produced and not them directly. How does any record label get a wikipedia page? Not getting into "Other Sites Exist" but I've looked at a few hundred and this seems pretty standard and like the kind of label that gets a wikipedia page. From what I have seen the only difference has been geographical location.

---