September 2015 edit

  This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing, BLP violations and peddling original research. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Someguy1221 (talk) 06:58, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.205.110.111 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

False accusations from multiple moderators conspiring to ignore objective facts reported by multiple reputable news sources, going as far as deleting the revision history to hide my edits despite the content provided being public openly-available knowledge from Associated Press and WPTV-TV. 24.205.110.111 (talk) 07:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

BS. Max Semenik (talk) 08:09, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.205.110.111 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I have reviewed the deleted edit that you made to the talkpage and agree that it pushes a defamatory idea that is totally unsupported by factual evidence. You cite the Associated Press and WPTV-TV, neither of which supports the allegations that you want to post. The only source in support of the allegation is a YouTube video that falls far from meeting Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sourcing due to its utter lack of any quality control or review. Continually pushing for its introduction, as well as accusing the administrator who maintained integrity on the page by keeping out defamatory content, is ample grounds to justify the block. This is the second unblock posting, immediately after the first was declined. Moreover, it makes a personal attack on MaxSem. Hence, I am removing talkpage access to prevent further abuse. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.