22sep

Issues

Please put new posts at the bottom so I can see them! I've cut a few things you've recently added all over this talk page and put them here!

Links

Iadmc(Jubileeclipman) I would like to edit from this link from now on .But now it is a bad link .Thank you --22sep (talk) 09:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

• If you mean the article Lt.Col.Thita Manitkul, it redirects to the draft article which you can edit at will.

Information

Did you see the information .Can you help?

• Not sure which info?

Iadmc(Jubileeclipman)(talk) Could you move this topic to my sandbox .i think it safer ?

• Which topic? The homosexual thing?that i also need it with the link of the dean too👍👍👍

Fact topic,please

they only delete the link that th:Sudarat was the one responsible

can google translate what i wrote in thai to the person who kept changing URL 😒 can we put togather some thing like that so people can have the picture of the situation

Tabloid

I found a lot of information please look into it.Still a lot more because i was looking at homosexaul fact.What I found was all about computers scandal and 6200 million Baht hundred s of artical.In my short life l never heard of that discrimination either.so i put what I found .Please correct them. you are welcomes to delete anything.

• Will check.

OK. You need to keep everything in one place so I can find it... Please put all new posts below this and one after another! Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) (talk) 13:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC) Did you see that all the link is blank The are flashing with artical that link to Sukavich its date like twenty years ago The group that try to change the link of the article every second .

the following link http//wikivisually.com/wiki/Draft _talk:Sukavich it gone now.There are professional do you still think we have a chance. now they will do everything to make sure our article would not published . Could you up date https//en.wiki2.org/wiki/Sukavich _Rangsitpol http://wikivisually.com/wiki/Sukavich _Rangsitpol if you search Sukavich Rangsitpol-Wikipedia the put the one still about homosexuality the first.Can you do something .?

The other day I thought if we put all the link it will be find .But now do you think we should delete or let them.? They so afraid the In formation get out should we put it under the other artical Corubtion in ThaiLand and forget this one. 10year ago https://www.facebook.com/H.E.Cherry was the Dean of one of Thammasart University So I decide to delete the topic . There to many evident against it .--22sep (talk) 04:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

family

they here too please move it to family ,I am thinking about police What is your nationality? Can we both use law in our country to get them

• http://www.manager.co.th/BizChannel/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=9580000109930-son [[please hide the son empty link. Do not delete it so the world know how much effort we have two put it this
• http://expertscape.com/au/lung+neoplasms/Suwatanapongched+ thtiporn-second daughter
• http://www.nsc.go.th/Pages/exeutive.aspx-first son in law
• https://www.samitivejhospitals.com/th/doctors/suban- suwatanapongched-second son-law
• http://m.neawna.com/view/lady/159796-daughter in law this one better http://www.matichon.co.th/news/62960
• http://med.mahidol.ac.th/th/news/announcement/04072016-1718-th-family

I'm not a politician!

OK... I can't help with Thai politics or law as I'm neither a politician nor a lawyer. Also, it isn't relevant to Wikipedia: you'll have to get an adult in Thailand to talk to a Thai lawyer; I'm in the UK.

The articles are come on well. I'll check back in a few days to copyedit and check sources (including those you've posted here). Keep going: no one owns Wikipedia and no one outside of the site can do anything about what's added to the article. The other versions you pointed to are either mirrors or the mobile version. Mirrors come and go so ignore them. The moble site is updated along with this version, so it should be current. Good luck Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Archived

I've archived your talk page as it was getting huge... The link to the old stuff is at the top. Iadmc (Jubileeclipman) (talk) 23:13, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Draft:Sukavich Rangsitpol page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)th: TRY TO INTERFERE KEEP DELETE THE LINK Iadmc (Jubileeclipman)(talk) please explain the situation . Bad people try to change URL, Can you do anything?

It just means there was an error in the coding. I've fixed it — Iadmc♫^talk  02:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Work!

Blimey! You know how to make work for people! I'll wade through your article when I get a chance and make it more presentable. You still need to fill in about the elections, though, so I'll leave you to it. Don't put your personal opinion in articles, like the bit I crossed out... Read WP:POV for more on this. Good luck — Iadmc♫^talk  02:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)--22sep (talk) 02:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC) ha ha Bangkok Constituguacy.  ???..that mean the area of one election/ the spelling == Can you report it ,i changed the last link under his son and son in law and it is ok now .They only change a little on each link .But it knows show on the page only us .It must be hacked .Can you protect the page that hidden user cannot edit .Before we figure it out l will only put down fact and source in wiki

 gender issue that are the reason i told you before that homosexual scandal was political lies .l think we should link the homosexual case you found to make sure . Then in the future ,there will be no more question on Thailand human rights on homosexual issue base on one political lies--22sep (talk) 03:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

in thailand has a lot of case that the media was edit I went back to the article,there is the sentence that the homosexual is not decease ......by some expert

And if there went on and ask about that and edit it .the other scandal i do not know but the homosexual i 100 %think its political lies.i do not know how to put the fact that lay out please write these solution. --22sep (talk) 03:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your request

I'm afraid that https://en.wiki2.org/ is not part of Wikipedia, and we cannot directly do anything about what they have on their site. The only way we can affect their content is that as a mirror, they take their content from here. Their page about "Sukavich Rangsitpol" appears to be down, which is, I think, what you were wanting. Some mirrors run well behind us, but others keep up to date. (There are quite a few of them - I can't really see the point of it, but they seem to like doing it, and so long as they state that their content comes from here, it's legal.) "Wiki" doesn't always mean that a site is connected to us. "WikiLeaks" for one definitely is NOT connected to Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation. Peridon (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

When I goto the article it came to others page its seam like somebody what the false article publish probably his political rival.It link to the old version to my older version can we redirect the version that was deleted because you fall into their trap ,They make the sources link error and have you deleted it .Can you figure it out how they can keep the false information. Or you can put the article version on 26 november back on his biography page i will fix it and you can delete it later that way the information will change. Please check history edit on the page .I think it theway to change a little thing on the page with out showing who did it.because in the article the link went to the wrong place.

Do you mean this version to be restored? Don't forget links can be hacked without being anything to do with Wikipedia! E.g. someone might make this redirect here and the Microsoft front page will appear to be the Google front page... Nothing to do with Wikipedia, rather a malicious hacker changing the Microsoft page directly. — Iadmc♫^talk  21:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Thai general election, 2001

This article is not protected, hence why you were able to edit it. What do you want changed? Number 57 00:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Sukavich Rangsitpol<ref>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Thita_Manitkul

Drafts

I'm going to have a proper look at Draft:Sukavich Rangsitpol and Draft:Thita Manitkul‎ after the holidays. There's a fair amount of work to be done and I notice you have often just dumped a few bare urls in sections, presumably to expand from them at a future date. Also, there's a large section in Thai, which I don't trust any of the translation software I have to render usefully into English. Any chance you could translate? Thanks — Iadmc♫^talk  21:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Sukavich Rangsitpol

Draft:Sukavich Rangsitpol, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sukavich Rangsitpol and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sukavich Rangsitpol during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sukavich Rangsitpol

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sukavich Rangsitpol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcrdaen/1/1/1_KJ00006742072/_pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)