March 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm S0091. I noticed that you recently removed content from Historical Vedic religion without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. S0091 (talk) 21:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Historical Vedic religion, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. SimeonManier (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Historical Vedic religion, you may be blocked from editing. SimeonManier (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Historical Vedic religion edit

Hi IP, per WP:BRD you are required to start a discussion on the article's talk so you can gain consensus for the changes you are proposing. Please take the time to follow the links I have provided. If you do not take the appropriate steps, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. This serves as your final warning. S0091 (talk) 21:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Historical Vedic religion. SimeonManier (talk) 21:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Indo-Aryan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SimeonManier (talk) 21:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.