Dec23 edit

I think you need to read wp:spa and wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I answer your questions on relevant page. Please don't bring wrong accusations to my personal page. 219.59.84.10 (talk) 15:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Have you edited any other page? Slatersteven (talk) 15:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes. 219.59.84.10 (talk) 15:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Not with this IP you have not, and you are replying to every post at LL, that is bludgeoning, you have had your say, and are adding nothing new. Slatersteven (talk) 15:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
It normal, good faith talk, replying to editors who reply me. You not administrator to ask about my edits, history. Please assume good faith. 219.59.84.10 (talk) 16:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
MAybe I am not, but this is now a waring, if you continue to bludgeon the talk page I will ask admins to look at you, via wp:ani. Slatersteven (talk) 16:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I will not respond to any more editors and create an account to post an RFC. 219.59.84.10 (talk) 16:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You might also need to read WP:NOTDUMB. Slatersteven (talk) 16:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Novem Linguae (talk) 18:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply