Kerry Shale

edit

Why do you insist on removing verifiable content? And why do you switch IPs while doing so? DatGuyTalkContribs 11:30, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in this edit to Kerry Shale, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kerry Shale, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kerry Shale, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Kerry Shale. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are sharing wrong information on Wikipedia. He was not bornj in 1952, he was born in 1958. The changes by DatGuy were already reverted by another user in the past. How often do we need to discuss it? The mentioned source is not verified. Even IMDb is more correct. 217.110.196.152 (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
IMDb is completely unreliable. BBC is reliable. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Look at the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYPsycyUV38 - Does he look like 29 years there? Most of sources tell 17 June 1958, his birthday is publicy celebrated on 17 June 1958. British Film Institute is not BBC, it is an unreliable source. If you look in the history of this Wikipedia page, that change was undone many, many times. 217.110.196.152 (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
In fact, providing the wrong birthday date on his official Wiki page is vandalism and will be reported to Wikipedia. 217.110.196.152 (talk) 15:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
What makes you say the BFI, which is partially funded by the British government and frequently cited, is unreliable? And IMDb, which is crowdsourced (along with Wikispro and Fandom) are? DatGuyTalkContribs 16:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 17:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.