Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (216.206.219.21) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Christian Academy of Lawrenceburg do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Christian Academy of Lawrenceburg. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

These athlete profiles do not appear to comply with the external link guidelines, as they do not provide expanded information about the school. If you disagree, I suggest explaining what value the links provide on the article's talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2011 edit

Your edits at Second Temple have been reverted - twice. Per WP:ERA: "Do not change from one style to another unless there is substantial reason for the change, and consensus for the change with other editors." Per WP:MOSNUM, "If an article has been stable in a given style, it should not be converted without a style-independent reason." and "Where Wikipedia does not mandate a specific style, editors should not attempt to convert Wikipedia to their own preferred style". Please refrain from making any more such edits. Hertz1888 (talk) 21:43, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

English edit

"Opined" is a word. See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/opine "Opinioned" is not. Please do not introduce spelling errors into wp articles, and if you think you see a spelling error perhaps you should google the word you do not recognize before you change it.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Jschnur. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Weekend Update, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jschnur (talk) 14:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vestiphobia (April 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 216.206.219.21, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kentucky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.