October 2016

edit
No warning to the other user engaged in the edit war? The one who has actually broke the 3RR? 213.205.198.74 (talk) 15:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
So... which banned user's sock puppet are you? Volunteer Marek (talk) 15:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
And now the personal attacks, fantastic. I'm on a public connection and don't wish to make my account vulnerable. Maybe you should be more concerned about your long history of edit-warring and general non-wikipedian ethics. 213.205.198.74 (talk) 15:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
(edit conflict) VM reverted three times, you reverted four. clpo13(talk) 15:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
And where is his warning? 213.205.198.74 (talk) 15:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:213.205.198.74 reported by User:Clpo13 (Result: ). Thank you. clpo13(talk) 15:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

213.205.198.74 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No clear explanation for ban, currently being discussed on admin noticeboard but this seems to have been bypassed, the other user (with a long history of edit warring and arguments) engaged in the edit war has not been blocked. Very confusing.

Decline reason:

You were unambiguously edit warring; whether or not someone else was blocked is not relevant -- you were warned, ignored the warning, and continued. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 16:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It wasn't a blog, it was balancing the article(s) to result in a NPOV. I was only reverting as much as the other user who had no sanction applied 213.205.198.74 (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
You are wrong on both counts, drastically so. As I don't want to assume you aren't very intelligent, I can only assume you are attempting to mislead and wikilawyer, and doing a poor job at it. Dennis Brown - 20:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Theo Wharton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:40, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Seven Nation Army, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Vsmith (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Rekonedth. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Definitely Maybe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Rekonedth (talk) 11:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dog's Most Wanted, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Breaking tags. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 06:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020

edit

  Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 22:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pick Up Performance Company have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Materialscientist (talk) 11:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.