February 2009 edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Knightsmith. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Versus22 talk 08:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

June 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to White tea, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Yunshui  14:06, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Treasury tag, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thanks, Ainlina(box)? 18:51, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mark Hughes, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Hughes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nzd (talk) 13:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm David Tornheim. I noticed that in this edit to Doppelgänger, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --David Tornheim (talk) 10:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Gustavo Hamer—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gustavo Hamer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 0qd (talk) 15:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.