October 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Demogorgon (Dungeons & Dragons) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Republic of the Congo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Web search engine. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —RainFall 11:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Web search engine. Larry Hockett (Talk) 11:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Municipality of Monaco. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 94rain Talk 12:43, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Monaco City, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Monaco City was changed by 212.139.176.73 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860325 on 2019-01-28T12:48:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to trigger the edit filter, as you did at Pitta, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you trigger the edit filter, as you did at Pitta. CLCStudent (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm KNHaw. An edit that you recently made to Kraków Ghetto seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KNHaw (talk) 17:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2022 edit

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Holiness in Judaism. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Dove's talk (talk) 13:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2022 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Imoesi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Such-change47 (talk) 09:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beth Stevens (September 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 212.139.176.73! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Beth Stevens edit

 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Beth Stevens, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HelenDegenerate(💬📖) 16:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply