Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

  • Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (211.27.70.114) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! OhKayeSierra (talk) 22:47, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism Warning edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Women's event at the 43rd Chess Olympiad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fbergo (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Top Chess Engine Championship, you may be blocked from editing. —Phenolla ⚫️🔵 08:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Piano Sonata No. 2 (Chopin). Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). This message was left at 11:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC) (That paragraph is not meant to be here.)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Piano Sonata No. 2 (Chopin). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  1. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zingarese talk · contribs 06:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wolrd Cup 2019 edit

Hi,

I removed the qualification paths by mistake, it wasn't intentional. If you just check my edit history you will see that I have been the most prolific user since 2015 on Wikiproject chess, I updated and fixed countless chess articles (biographies, chess tournaments, FIDE events, including world cups etc.); also most details I added in chess biographies have been copy-pasted by major chess news website. If you check the article history, you can see that I fixed the list of qualifiers, changed the verbal tenses, as the article was a bare copy-paste of previous world cups. I just don't get why do you left the question an anonymous editor wrote just below the list of qualifiers, there is the talk page...Sophia91 (talk) 19:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply