209.122.160.79

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

16:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Yamla (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

January 2022

Hello, I'm Linguist111. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of exoplanet extremes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Linguist111 (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Political views of Subhas Chandra Bose, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Leonidlednev (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Friday, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm FrederalBacon. I noticed that in this edit to List of fictional tricksters, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FrederalBacon (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello, I'm Minorax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cinema Rex fire—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello, I'm ZaperaWiki44. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, B3 1715+425, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Regards—ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 20:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

i am new to this and have trouble with sources

here is the source

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.04067.pdf (A NEARLY NAKED SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE)

can you put this in please? 209.122.160.79 (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2023

Hello, I'm Nagol0929. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cosmos Redshift 7, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nagol0929 (talk) 13:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

i added the link but i am not that experencedat editing; link is here https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/No-evidence-for-Population-III-stars-or-a-direct-in-Bowler-McLure/10eccae979b5eec860f73cdeb26ffe467317b9a4 209.122.160.79 (talk) 13:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

hi

here are the sources i used

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.00727.pdf(No evidence for Population III stars or a Direct Collapse Black Hole in the z = 6.6 Lyman-α emitter ‘CR7’)

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9931/pdf(ALMA Reveals Metals yet No Dust within Multiple Components in CR7)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.01731.pdf(The nature of CR7 revealed with MUSE: a young starburst powering extended Lyman-α emission at z=6.6)

can you put these in for me? 209.122.160.79 (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Theatre of ancient Greece. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nagol0929 (talk) 14:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

209.122.160.79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

this is a school Ip address so multiple people can use it. also i have issue with getting sources to work properly 209.122.160.79 (talk) 13:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately there is a long history of disruptive editing from this IP address going back many years despite multiple shorter blocks. Students or faculty may still edit if they log in with a WP:ACCOUNT. Please see the block notice at the top of this page. Best regards... Ad Orientem (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Jmaes

Hello, 209.122.160.79. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jmaes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jmaes

Hello, 209.122.160.79. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jmaes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Autoblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

209.122.160.79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Could you temporarily lift the hardblock so I can attach an account I just created? I would prefer not to list it here for privacy reasons, but a CheckUser on Meta can confirm I just created an account there. Side note: I was helped in formulating my response by a more experienced Wikipedian (who is currently blocked), I am not them nor will I proxy on their behalf

Decline reason:

No. WP:ACC is available to you. Yamla (talk) 16:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---