Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.87.236.180 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

per special:diff/1146694343. --208.87.236.180 (talk) 15:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The block has been anon-only since that discussion. Feel free to create an account. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jpgordon: another editor (oshwah) blocked the range with ACB. please see 208.87.232.0/21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.87.236.180 (talk) 15:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ugh, and I see why. It's short term, Oshwah is clearly hoping this long term abuser doesn't come back again. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
That is correct. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply