To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

June 2015 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ault, Colorado, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 17:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Haxtun, Colorado. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MarnetteD|Talk 17:44, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bonanza, Colorado. MarnetteD|Talk 17:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas R. Kline School of Law. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2015 edit

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to John Waite. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MusikAnimal talk 17:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. An edit you recently made to Festival Foods seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 21:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to North Bullitt High School— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 23:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Liberal— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MusikAnimal talk 14:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kirk Cousins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Widr (talk) 17:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Waite, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylbecatulous talk 12:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Granicus (band) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Granicus (band) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mz7 (talk) 21:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Granicus (band). Mz7 (talk) 21:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Kane. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
And I've just reverted your vandal edits at Whitehall (Annapolis, Maryland) and at Maine Black Bears football. You appear to be a vandal-only account, and I will now ask for admin intervention. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 20:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Bluefist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Endless River— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bluefist talk 18:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2016 edit

  Your recent edit to 1989 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. -- Irn (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Johnson (running back). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WNYY98 (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.87.234.202 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 208.87.234.202. Quotient Sciences is a private corporation not a web host. 208.87.234.202 (talk) 15:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Given the long history of vandalism from this proxy, I'm unwilling to consider lifting the block even if it is used as a proxy only by a single private corporation. Yamla (talk) 15:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.