Welcome

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits to the page Same-sex marriage, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help see:

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Spotfixer (talk) 00:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit summarys

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Same-sex marriage. Thank you. -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

This IP Address Is NOT Being Used By Skoojal

edit

Your word isn't good enough, just wait for the SPI report to come clean. Look at it this way, if you're not a sockpuppet, you have nothing to worry about. Until then, the tag stays.— dαlus Contribs 23:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Frankly, I couldn't care less about whether the tag is there or not. 208.105.149.80 (talk) 23:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

But to the point, the original tag on your other IP address was added by an admin, so, whether you aren't a sock, or whether you are, is still up for debate until the sockpuppet investigation comes back positive or negative.— dαlus Contribs 23:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:3RR

edit

You appear to be engaged in edit warring across multiple pages. It is incredibly disruptive and can result in a block. If there are controversial issues, use the talk pages to discuss them rather than just reverting another editor's edits. Grsz11 18:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not so. I have not violated WP:3RR even once, and I defy you to come up with a single instance where I have done so. You have reverted sourced material on the Kevin Jennings page. I believe your edit was off base, and I am completely within bounds to challenge you. Your accusations are untrue and misleading. In an effort to assume good faith, I will stop short of speculating as to the motives behind your edits. One question: Did you "clear" your reverts on the talk page before making them? If not, why do you expect me to do so?

208.105.149.80 (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply