206.188.36.139

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.188.36.139 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You have blocked the biggest library system in the United States (according to Wikipedia using 2010 data). This county is approximately 100 miles wide and 40 miles long. Please unblock. Either that or treat everyone equally and block the entire United States of America. The net effect would be about the same, 98-99% of innocent users harmed versus 1-2% of vandals.

Decline reason:

Given that in the past few months this IP address has consistently been used only by the vandal (and now you), there doesn't seem to be many false positives here. If you aren't the person this block is meant for, you are welcome to request creation of an account. Huon (talk) 19:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I certainly understand (and apologize for) your frustration. Another anonymous user had abused multiple IP addresses within an IP range that your IP address happens to fall into, and hence the range 206.188.36.0/24 was blocked by an administrator. --JustBerry (talk) 19:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Please understand, though, that the block settings are 'anon. only, account creation blocked.' Although account creation is blocked, existing users can login, as the block is for anonymous editing only. Feel free to request an account be created for you at WP:ACC. The IP range will most likely not be unblocked prior to the ban's expiry on ~ February 5. --JustBerry (talk) 19:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

@Bagumba: Regardless, I can ping the IP range blocking admin for you if you wish to seek further clarification. ^{(IP range: 206.188.36.0/24; SPI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dereks1x)}. --JustBerry (talk) 19:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC) ^{(addressed by Huon (talk · contribs))}

Note to reviewing administrator: please refer to User talk:206.188.36.147. --JustBerry (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Gamebuster19901. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2017 Pac-12 Conference Women's Basketball Tournament have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 18:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.188.36.139 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wonder what did I do wrong from preventing from blocking me for 60 days for? Because this doesn't make any sense to me because I doing alright until (Bagumba) blocked me until May, can you please unblock me ASAP cuz I can't be denied again

Decline reason:

Incoherent unblock request which appears to be a threat. Yamla (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.188.36.139 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

A treat? So you're telling me that I blocked because someone threating me? That doesn't make sense to me, but I wounder why it is a threat still for something I didn't do wrong

Decline reason:

Feel free to create an account. There's been sufficient vandalism from this IP address that to protect Wikipedia, we limit it to use by registered accounts only. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 23:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2018

Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lisa Lillien— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. L293D (✉) 02:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lisa Lillien. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Fort Myers

Fort Myers, Florida... not Meyers! Thanks. wbm1058 (talk) 02:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sumner Redstone, you may be blocked from editing. Waggie (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sumner Redstone. _{Vermont | reply here} 00:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sumner Redstone, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LynxTufts (talk) 20:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:25, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---