October 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been disallowed by an edit filter because they did not appear constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Also feel free to ask for assistance at the Help Desk whenever you like to. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Protozoan infection. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Protozoan infection was changed by 205.121.71.242 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856905 on 2020-10-29T18:11:41+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Protozoan infection, you may be blocked from editing. Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm 1subAtomic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chet Baker have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ❯❯ 1subAtomic (💬Talk) 20:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chet Baker. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chet Baker was changed by 205.121.71.242 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918687 on 2020-11-04T20:43:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:43, 4 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia and trigger the edit filter, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

205.121.71.242 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did not make those edits

Decline reason:

Excellent. Then you are free to edit. Simply sign in with your account. If you don't have an account already, one may be created for you via WP:ACC. Yamla (talk) 15:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Laplorfill. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Paradise, Utah, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 20:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hyrum, Utah, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gluzman, you may be blocked from editing. Linxgos (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Victoria Granatto have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yellowknife greenstone belt. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yellowknife greenstone belt was changed by 205.121.71.242 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.985258 on 2021-05-12T18:07:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Meigs Field—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Airbus. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -Jamesluiz102- (talk) (contribs) 15:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gangue. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Heart (talk) 17:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lady Julia Percy Island. Serols (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

205.121.71.242 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What did I do wrong?

Decline reason:

This seems to be a shared/public computer. If you don't think you did anything wrong, you probably didn't. We don't know who is sitting at the computer editing, only that inappropriate edits came from this IP address. If you were not responsible for any inappropriate edits, you should create an account elsewhere, or request one at WP:ACC. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.