Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.
unblock edit
204.2.36.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 204.2.36.253. 204.2.36.253 (talk) 00:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I've unblocked the IP range. It may have been reallocated, so I guess it's worth seeing what kinds of edits happen here now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
NinjaRobotPirate, I don't know what the range was, but you may want to check it again. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I blocked Special:Contributions/204.2.36.0/24 as a proxy in 2023. It was being used by sock puppets. If it's just some random disruption or maybe even vandalism, normal anon-only blocks would probably be fine. I guess I was curious to see if more socks and spammers would flock to the IP range. It seems they haven't. I just ran a CU, and it's pretty clear of disruption outside of this IP editor. If more socks and spammers appeared here, I'd probably hard block it again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024 edit
Hello, I'm GoingBatty. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Help desk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GoingBatty (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- i have a question at the help desk. can you answer it? 204.2.36.253 (talk) 21:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
204.2.36.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i understand i was editing disruptively. if i get unblocked, i will not vandalize the article namespace and i will make sure my edits are good.
Decline reason:
We extended good faith less than a month ago and were met with blatant vandalism. I think ScottishFinnishRadish is being very kind, blocking for only a month. Yamla (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
204.2.36.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i understand i was editing disruptively. if i get unblocked, i will not vandalize the article namespace and i will
make sure my edits are good. @AmandaNP: 204.2.36.253 (talk) 21:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I don't know why you pinged me specifically, but I agree with my fellow administrators that the block should remain. -- Amanda (she/her) 05:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
204.2.36.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for "disrutive editing". It appears that this refers to this edit by me. However, the policy defining vandalism specifically excludes "making bold edits" intended to improve Wikipedia, as I did in this instance. Because the action for which I was blocked was therefore not disruption as described in the blocking policy, I request to be unblocked.@AmandaNP:204.2.36.253 (talk) 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
From your first appeal: "i understand i was editing disruptively". From your second appeal: "i understand i was editing disruptively" Now we get something along the lines of "My edits weren't disruptive, just bold"! So which is it? Answer: It doesn't matter as, even if your Megalopolis edit was bold, this IP should be blocked from the editing for the forseeable future due to the oversighted edit on April 15th. No thank you. Ponyobons mots 21:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |