204.126.11.218

November 2012

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Elliptical galaxy because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Air mass was changed by 204.126.11.218 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866478 on 2013-01-02T16:20:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Air mass with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MadGuy7023 (talk) 16:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Air mass with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mark91it's my world 16:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Air mass. Mark91it's my world 16:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 12:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christmas stocking. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 17:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Door in the Wall (novel)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Door in the Wall (novel). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Door in the Wall (novel) was changed by 204.126.11.218 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.98749 on 2017-12-14T19:40:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Door in the Wall (novel), you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Alan Gratz—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alan Gratz. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alan Gratz was changed by 204.126.11.218 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968075 on 2021-10-27T17:28:03+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alan Gratz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alan Gratz, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Percy Bysshe Shelley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ZOE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:ZOE, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 20:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ZOE (February 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Silikonz was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Silikonz💬 20:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 204.126.11.218! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Silikonz💬 20:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

---