August 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ang Panday 2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vítor (talk) 06:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Viva Television, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Carl Sturken and Evan Rogers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Information. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Just plain Bill (talk) 23:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, 22nd century. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 02:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Simplexity22. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joe Alwyn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 05:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Our Lady of Fátima. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bataan Death March, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 10:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Cyrus noto3at bulaga. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to IV of Spades: have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Cyrus noto3at bulaga Talk to me 09:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Politics of the Philippines, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Summer Olympics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.