203.168.51.242

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rugby League State of Origin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rugby League State of Origin was changed by 203.168.51.242 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-06-03T02:18:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Rugby League State of Origin. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Icseaturtles★ 02:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rugby League State of Origin. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Icseaturtles★ 02:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Sheriff of Nottingham worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 01:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

your Gladiator edit

Hi! I notice you removed the passage regarding "gossip and hearsay" over the parentage of Commodus. The gossip was Roman, and though later than Commodus' own lifetime (and biased against him) it should stand. The Historia Augusta (whence the information comes) is not the most reliable of sources, but in some cases is the only version of certain events. Some of its material is "factually" doubtful (as are a great many supposedly factual statements in contemporary Roman histories) but clearly demonstrate Roman perceptions of him. I've therefore reverted the change. It would be better to discuss such issues on the talk page before cutting material - which you will notice is properly cited. Regards. Haploidavey (talk) 09:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Tammin Sursok has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. - RUL3R^*trolling_*vandalism 05:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Tammin Sursok. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. - RUL3R^*trolling_*vandalism 05:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Last Judgment (Michelangelo) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.   — Jeff G.  ツ 06:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:The Last Judgment (Michelangelo), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:34, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Annie has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 08:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chinese calendar, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Mechanical digger (talk) 11:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Welcome Stranger, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 07:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheek kissing, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 11:03, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to Yolngu, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. jbergste (talk) 14:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Danielle Campbell with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anirudh Emani (talk) 07:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Tide rolls. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to P90X with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tiderolls 01:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Stanley (maxmoefoe).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Joe  ₪  19:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Hello, I'm ChrisGualtieri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sprouted bread because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013

Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Matt Doran because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pratyya ^(Hello!) 14:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Estonia ‎ , but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Quigley Down Under may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• distances. Quigley's [[signature weapon|weapon of choice]] is a customized 1874 Quigley rifle]. He answers a newspaper advertisement that asks for men with a special talent in long-distance

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Stanley (maxmoefoe) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Stanley (maxmoefoe), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Stanley (maxmoefoe)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Stanley (maxmoefoe), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Anne Delong (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

---