November 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Queen of Hearts. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Anti-gender movement that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Regardless of how valid your concerns are, telling someone to "fuck off" is an inappropriate personal attack. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (no relation) 23:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

my comment was civil, being reverted on the basis of being a "transphobic bigot" for not affirming the beliefs of others is very much against the wikipedia way. 202.180.122.12 (talk) 23:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at User talk:202.180.122.12. You do know that your block can be extended and that your access to this Talk page can be revoked if you continue to abuse Wikipedia as your own personal soapbox? DanielRigal (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Possible sockpuppetry edit

Note to any future admins reading this page: Please note that this IP address has indicated a willingness to engage in sockpuppetry: diff. Please take this into account if any sockpuppetry is found that closely matches the transphobic and ranty editing pattern here. DanielRigal (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
you're actually being really rude, you're talking past me instead of to me. you're making accusations and insinuations about the intent of my words. SO OF COURSE im going to ignore you and just get a new ip address. if you were willing to respect the human i wouldn't be forced to. 202.180.122.12 (talk) 00:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
is it a hatecrime against religion to not affirm religious beleifs?
is it transphobia to not affirm the beliefs of trans people? 202.180.122.12 (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
the incidious comment that started all of this drama contained absolutely no transphobia.
but none of you will even let me talk about it on my talk page.
== sex is biology, gender is philosophy ==
I belong to none of the groups listed in the preamble.
As an autistic man i find this entire debate to be completely absurd.
It's easy to not be a bigot and let other people live their best lives possible.
Trans people are not tinkerbell, Their existence is not dependent on the rest of us affirming their beliefs.
We don't put up with it from religion or any other ideology, and nor should we with gender.
I affirm that the reality of biological sex is the only one that truly exists.
This article is incredibly biased. 202.180.122.12 (talk) 00:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
It is transphobia to not affirm someone's gender identity, yes. If someone says they're a woman and the response is "no you're a man", that's textbook what transphobia is. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
did i do that or are you grasping at straws? 202.180.122.12 (talk) 00:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please don't waste your time arguing with this one. There is nothing fixable here and your time is worth more than that. They just want somebody to scream at. I think it is time to yank Talk page access and just keep an eye open for them popping up on any new IPs. DanielRigal (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply